Fewer choices – better results?

7 09 2009

Someone has at last had the sense to apply psychology – specifically a controversial social psychologist – to help people choose a charity. The result is at Guidestar’s shiny new Giving Formula.

Instead of offering a list of all (20?) types of charity, there’s a simple four-way split between “Personal”, “Emotional”, “Social” and “Environmental”.

The truth is that those aren’t the right four words to describe what they represent (a spot of user research could fix that), but what I like is the fact that they are meta-categories, namely: health & medical; arts & music; poverty & rights; environment & animals.

Guidestar is challenging the common assumption that most donors know precisely which cause they want to support. Trying to distil their choices into four high-level groups is a canny step forward. The Formula is not perfect, but I like what it’s trying to do.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: